APNU, WIN rebuke govt for slow-paced procurement of MV Barima salvager

What this source establishes

The opposition's response to the salvage decision, and it moves the argument from whether to raise the vessel to how fast. APNU's Ganesh Mahipaul argues that an expression-of-interest process closing on 14 August pushes the start of salvage to late August or early September once evaluation, bidding, contracting and mobilisation are counted, and calls for emergency procurement instead: "That timeline is simply unacceptable." His sharpest point is that the evidence the notice exists to protect is decaying while the process runs — "Salt water is unforgiving." No government response appears. The report also carries figure errors — the sinking dated to 19 July, and the survivor and fatality counts inverted — which are recorded here as the outlet's, not as a movement in the record.

Key claims

• **The opposition attacks the salvage decision on speed rather than on principle** — the first time the wreck argument has moved from whether to how fast.
• APNU MP **Ganesh Mahipaul** argues the expression-of-interest route, closing 14 August, means salvage would not begin until late August or early September once evaluation, shortlisting, bidding, contract execution and mobilisation are done: "That timeline is simply unacceptable."
• On deterioration: "Salt water is unforgiving. Mechanical systems corrode, electronic equipment deteriorates…" — an argument that the evidential value the notice is meant to protect is itself decaying while the procurement runs.
• He calls for **emergency procurement procedures** rather than a competitive process, given the gravity of the casualty.
• WIN's stated position is that the delay leaves families awaiting "answers and closure they deserve". Mahipaul also criticises the rejection of the Opposition Leader's offer to fund salvage privately at no cost to taxpayers.
• [UNRESOLVED] **No government response to any of this appears in the report.**
• [CONTESTED] The report contains figure errors against every other source in this corpus: it dates the sinking to **19 July** rather than 18, and gives "179 passengers aboard (72 rescued, 76 dead, 30 missing)", inverting the survivor and fatality figures this archive carries as 76 survivors and 73 recovered. Recorded as an outlet error, not as a divergence in the record.

This page is a research summary prepared for comment and review. It is not the article. Copyright in the original remains with Demerara Waves; the full text is held only in the private research corpus from which this archive was compiled. Follow the link above to read it at the source.