Govt. scapegoating MV Barima crew with 'ridiculous, vindictive' murder charges – Norton

What this source establishes

The first time the opposition leader has put the charging decision in these terms: that the three charged employees are being scapegoated to shield ministers. Norton calls the charges "ridiculous, vindictive, and intended to silence the workers" and moves the question up the chain — who allowed the vessel to sail, who certified it, who supervised its maintenance. Two things in it are new to this corpus: the demand that the state say which ministries owned the cargo aboard, and the allegation that pre-departure inspection procedures broke down. Both are single-source. The piece also repeats a characterisation of the DPP's statement that this archive has already recorded as the reporting outlet's wording and not a quotation of her, and it is flagged rather than carried.

Key claims

• **Aubrey Norton**, PNCR chairman and leader of A Partnership for National Unity, speaking at APNU's weekly press conference on Friday 31 July, calls the murder charges against the captain, chief mate and goods superintendent "ridiculous, vindictive, and intended to silence the workers".
• He argues the charges are premature, laid before the Commission of Inquiry could establish a cause, and states that "nothing publicly shown so far proves that these men deliberately intended to kill passengers". **These are the assertions of an opposition leader about a live prosecution and this archive adopts none of them; the three men are charged and untried.**
• He redirects the accountability question upward, asking: "Who allowed a government vessel with defective systems to sail? Who certified it? Who supervised its maintenance?"
• He demands public disclosure of the complete cargo manifests, weight certificates, maintenance reports, surveillance recordings and inspection certificates — and, new to this corpus, that the state identify **which ministries owned the cargo aboard**.
• [SINGLE SOURCE] He alleges that normal inspection procedures broke down before departure, and that the vessel was kept in service against the advice of professional staff. Neither is corroborated here.
• He repeats the demand that Ministers Juan Edghill and Deodat Indar resign to allow an impartial investigation.
• [CONTESTED] The report states that the Director of Public Prosecutions "previously acknowledged the vessel had defective navigational and safety systems". **This archive has already recorded that characterisation as a reporting outlet's wording rather than a quotation of the DPP**, and it must not be cited as her admission — see the figures page.

This page is a research summary prepared for comment and review. It is not the article. Copyright in the original remains with Kaieteur News; the full text is held only in the private research corpus from which this archive was compiled. Follow the link above to read it at the source.